Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Edward F Dijeau's avatar

Green Buildings:

The less a consumer uses but gets the same overall benefits and comfort, the better it is for everyone EXCEPT for the UUTILITIES and their neighbors. The utilities base their income on selling electricity by the kilo watt hour to pay for the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. The utilities successfully argued to the California Public utility Commission that green buildings and rooftop solar "cost shifted" the infrastructure costs onto the poorer properties that could not go to all the expense of going fully sustainable and "cut the compensation" for energy generated back onto the grid by rooftop solar by 75%. Now to compensate and even the "playing field", they have put a $24.00 USD monthly connection charge on all Residential customers with or without the solar or energy upgrades to cover infrastructure upgrades. A fixed fee, but lowering the per kilo watt hour charge, giving the poorer property owners a break but also gave the utilities a fixed source of income to do upgrades in renewable energy storage and distribution. Applauding the work and genius of the builders and designers of going green is great. Getting the utilities out of the hands of the fossil fuel industries will be harder.

Edward F Dijeau's avatar

Solar Energy is the least costly energy source in the world. Solar panels prices have dropped 82% over the past 15 years. Installation, maintenance and eventual replacement costs that use no outside fuel other than the SUN makes it a real-world winner. The one drawback is the real-world needs power 24/7/365 and that means storage of electricity, for cloudy and nighttime usage need to be integrated. For large commercial systems, that can be built on the site when the utility lines are run to at the time of construction BUT it doubles the cost of building, maintaining and eventual replacement cost can even triple the total cost of an installation over time. A better solution is Utility owned storage that is built and paid for in the tariffs' charged by the utility since it will be an ongoing cost to maintain and replace but also lets the utility decide which electrical sources to divert or use. Midday curtailment (throwing the power away) of solar energy has become a problem in areas where solar has become the dominant source of energy. putting that curtailed energy into battery storage, pumped hydro storage or even Hydrogen generation element storage to use in older natural gas power plants needs to be done by the utilities. This means the utility regulators must make decisions outside the fossil fuel industries demands. Many countries are doing that now, but it means that costs for transmission and distribution system building outlays have increased dramatically. To cover these costs, a monthly service fee is being added to the "Meter Fee" for all customers. This infrastructure cost fee then reduces the per kilo watt hour fee charged for the electricity but is a constant income source dedicated to improving distribution and air quality. The SUN may be free, but the infrastructure to distribute 24/7/365 it is not.

No posts

Ready for more?